
Rospotrebnadzor ends contact observation and calls second-case reports fake (π·πΊ)
happened first published
- Claimed Local media and Telegram channels reported pneumonic plague after a lab accident. per the outlets, naming no source Read with skepticism: unnamed source, too early to know1
- (π·πΊ) found no lab accident and no plague among 197 contacts. per Rospotrebnadzor (π·πΊ) Read with skepticism: record of concealment, no evidence shown1
- (π·πΊ) said on 4 October that no microorganisms related to 's work were found in 's samples. per Rospotrebnadzor (π·πΊ) Read with skepticism: record of concealment, no evidence shown1
- Confirmed Russia (π·πΊ) told (πΊπ³) on 6 October that no plague was recorded in in or anyone else. Read with skepticism: no evidence shown, record of concealment1
- Confirmed (π·πΊ) said on 8 October that observation of all contacts had ended. per Rospotrebnadzor (π·πΊ) Read with skepticism: record of concealment1
- Confirmed (π·πΊ) called reports of a second case fake. per Rospotrebnadzor (π·πΊ) Read with skepticism: record of concealment, no evidence shown1
- The governor said on 8 October that the quarantine had been lifted.1
- No laboratory result has been published and no pathogen has been named. per the outlets, naming no source1
- (πΊπ³) has asked which pathogen caused 's pneumonia. per WHO (πΊπ³)1
- Confirmed (πΊπ³) said on 7 October that it did not understand how was infected. per WHO (πΊπ³)1
- (π·πΊ) said on 8 October that was vaccinated and immune to the dangerous infections handled at 's work. per Rospotrebnadzor (π·πΊ) Read with skepticism: record of concealment, no evidence shown
- (π·πΊ) referred on 8 October to the case as community-acquired pneumonia. per Rospotrebnadzor (π·πΊ) Read with skepticism: record of concealment, too early to know1
- Confirmed (πΊπ³) rated the risk on 6 October as moderate to low for and very low for . per WHO (πΊπ³) Read with skepticism: contradicted1
- Confirmed (πΊπ³) said on 10 October it found no evidence of ongoing transmission. per WHO (πΊπ³) Read with skepticism: no evidence shown1
- Confirmed (πΊπ³) said a laboratory-associated exposure cannot be fully excluded without a confirmed diagnosis. per WHO (πΊπ³)1